Skip to content

Cookie preferences

Choose which cookies and similar technologies this site may use. The strictly necessary ones keep the site working and remember this choice, so they cannot be turned off; they store nothing that identifies you or follows your browsing. Read the cookie notice

Continuumship
Menu

For regulated delivery

Oversight you can show, not describe.

Regulators and your own customers ask how people oversee the agents in your delivery. Continuumship records each decision, who made it, what they saw and what was verified, and reconstructs any lifecycle on request.

Talk to us Pricing
Every decision and claim, who made it, against what, and how far it can be trusted.

What you ask us

The auditor asks for the record, not the policy.

  • “How do we evidence human oversight?”

    EU AI Act Articles 14 and 26 and ISO/IEC 42001 ask how people oversee AI systems. Your policy says they do. The record has to show it.

  • “Separation of duties is a checkbox.”

    When the team is short, the same engineer writes, approves and deploys. The tool allows it, and nobody sees it until the audit.

  • “One release takes a week to reconstruct.”

    The ticket, the review, the pipeline and the deploy live in four systems. Assembling what happened, in order, is manual work every time.

How Continuumship answers

Every decision on the record, in the order it happened.

Oversight, recorded

Every approval names who decided, against what, and when. Every agent run carries its brief, its approver and what was verified, each claim labelled verified, measured or reported.

  • Integrity failures that cannot be overridden
  • Production writes never delegated to an agent

Separation of duties, enforced

Whoever produced the work does not approve it, and whoever triggers a release does not approve it. The server enforces it; a same-person approval is refused, not flagged.

  • Two approvals from people who did not write the change
  • Guardrails no team can remove

Packs and attestations

Compliance and reconstruction packs rebuild a lifecycle for the auditor. An attestation is the signed statement that an artifact passed what was required, and your cluster can require it.

  • A hash-chained audit log, streamed to your SIEM
  • Evidence exports with hashes

How to start

Start with the record, then guardrails in shadow.

In thirty days on one Area you see your process as it runs, and what your controls would have required of it, before anything is enforced.

  1. Week 0 · Review and connect

    Review the read-only, metadata-only scopes. Then connect the tracker, the code host, the pipelines and one observability source.

  2. Week 1 · History and discovery

    History is read back with each source's own times. The process the team really follows is discovered.

  3. Week 2 · Confirm and shadow

    The team confirms the discovered flow. Your controls are written as guardrails and approval chains, and put in shadow.

  4. Weeks 3–4 · Shadow on live work

    Each control records what it would have required and refused, with the items. We read the report together, and you decide.

Questions compliance leads ask

Does Continuumship make us compliant?
No product can. Continuumship gives you the mechanisms and the evidence an assessment asks for: who oversaw which agent, on what evidence, with separation of duties and a record you can reconstruct. Whether that meets your obligations is for you and your assessor to decide.

What does the auditor receive?
A compliance pack and a reconstruction pack: the lifecycle of each work item in order, every approval and who gave it, the evidence with its provenance, and the audit log entries — exported with hashes so they can be checked.

Can we try our controls before they bind?
Yes. Every guardrail is tried in shadow first. It records what it would have required and refused on live work, and you enforce it once you have read what it would have done.

Give the auditor the record.

Ask for the security review packet, then run a thirty-day shadow pilot on one Area.

Talk to us Pricing