Skip to content

Cookie preferences

Choose which cookies and similar technologies this site may use. The strictly necessary ones keep the site working and remember this choice, so they cannot be turned off; they store nothing that identifies you or follows your browsing. Read the cookie notice

Continuumship
Menu

For multi-tool stacks

Keep every tool. Run one process across them.

Most companies do not live in one vendor. Continuumship connects to the tracker, the code host, the pipelines and the deploy tool you already run, and holds the process, the decisions and the evidence across them.

Talk to us Pricing
Seven tools you keep, and one process drawn through the ones a flow uses.

What you tell us

Four vendors, and each wants the whole lifecycle.

  • “We're not consolidating this year.”

    Jira, GitLab, a pipeline somebody wrote in 2019, Argo CD. Each one works. Moving everything into one of them is a project nobody has a budget for.

  • “The process lives in people's heads.”

    Which pipeline gates which release, who approves production, what happens after a merge — three people know, and it is written nowhere.

  • “The work between tools is invisible.”

    Each tool reports on itself. The wait between a merged change and a deploy belongs to no dashboard.

How Continuumship answers

Neutral by design.

Nothing is replaced

Jira or Linear stays the system of record. Continuumship routes, gates and records around it and links back without copying content. Your pipelines and your deploy tool stay where they are.

  • Any CI/CD through a vendor-neutral event intake
  • History read back with each source's own times

Eight support states

Every capability answers in one of eight support states before you rely on it — per tool, per capability, per Area. Supported means an adapter passed its contract suite.

  • Observe, Orchestrate or Manage, chosen per capability
  • Write access asked for only when a capability needs it

The system graph across repositories

Interfaces, consumers and owners across your systems, three hops out, whichever code host each repository lives on. Every brief says what a change touches before the review starts.

  • Each edge says how it is known
  • Metadata and ownership, never your code

How to start

Connect the stack you have. Change nothing.

In thirty days on one Area you see how work really moves between your tools, where it waits, and what one process across them would ask.

  1. Week 0 · Connect

    Connect the tracker and the code host read-only. Your other pipelines and your deploy tool post their events to the intake.

  2. Week 1 · History and discovery

    History is read back and each change is joined across tools, with how each link is known. The real process is discovered.

  3. Week 2 · Confirm and shadow

    The team's lead confirms the discovered flow. Your tools become its steps, and the guardrails go into shadow.

  4. Weeks 3–4 · Shadow on live work

    Shadow evaluation runs on live work across every tool. We read the adoption report together, and you decide.

Questions multi-tool teams ask

Do we have to move off Jira?
No. Jira stays the system of record for the projects you map. Continuumship routes, gates and records around it and links back without copying content. While you connect and observe, your teams do not open Continuumship at all.

What about tools without an adapter?
They send events to the vendor-neutral intake: CloudEvents with CDEvents types, believed by signature or by workload identity. A Jenkins plugin or an Argo CD notification template is enough. Each capability then answers in a support state, so you know what is observed and what is orchestrated.

Is this lock-in in another shape?
Definitions are files in a documented schema, in your Git if you choose. Evidence exports with hashes. The tracker stays yours. You replace a tool only when you decide it has been outgrown.

Hold your stack together.

A thirty-day shadow pilot on one Area: connect the tools you have, see how you ship across them, decide.

Talk to us Pricing